Saturday, January 22, 2011

Francis Ford Coppola On Art, Copying And File Sharing: We Want You To Take From Us | Techdirt

Paul Tamm points us to a really wonderful interview with filmmaker Francis Ford Coppola, which touches on a whole variety of different topics, but a couple of quotes are likely to be interesting to folks around here. For example, he’s asked about copying works of other filmmakers and whether or not he tries to “veer away” from the masters of the craft to create his own style, and he responds brilliantly:
I once found a little excerpt from Balzac. He speaks about a young writer who stole some of his prose. The thing that almost made me weep, he said, “I was so happy when this young person took from me.” Because that’s what we want. We want you to take from us. We want you, at first, to steal from us, because you can’t steal. You will take what we give you and you will put it in your own voice and that’s how you will find your voice.

And that’s how you begin. And then one day someone will steal from you. And Balzac said that in his book: It makes me so happy because it makes me immortal because I know that 200 years from now there will be people doing things that somehow I am part of. So the answer to your question is: Don’t worry about whether it’s appropriate to borrow or to take or do something like someone you admire because that’s only the first step and you have to take the first step.
While (of course), I always dislike the incorrect use of the term “stealing,” I found this to be quite an insightful answer from someone who is certainly in a position to pretend otherwise. However, throughout history we’ve heard similar (if much less eloquent) claims from others. Ray Charles famously made similar points about copying his music (shamelessly) from others to create his own unique sound (and invent soul music in the process).

Immediately after this, he’s asked about business models, and he notes:
This idea of Metallica or some rock n’ roll singer being rich, that’s not necessarily going to happen anymore. Because, as we enter into a new age, maybe art will be free. Maybe the students are right. They should be able to download music and movies. I’m going to be shot for saying this. But who said art has to cost money? And therefore, who says artists have to make money?

In the old days, 200 years ago, if you were a composer, the only way you could make money was to travel with the orchestra and be the conductor, because then you’d be paid as a musician. There was no recording. There were no record royalties. So I would say, “Try to disconnect the idea of cinema with the idea of making a living and money.” Because there are ways around it.
While some will misinterpret this to mean that artists shouldn’t make money, that’s not what he’s saying at all. He’s saying it shouldn’t be presumed that they automatically must make money — or that if they are to make money, that it needs to come from the film directly.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Books I Read in 2010

My goal was 12 for the year, and I finished the 15th on December 30th. 

Looking back, the list is a bit sci-fi/thriller-heavy, but they were all a fun in their own way. I'll branch out more in 2011 and pick up a few classics I have always wanted to read, but for which I've never allowed the time.

I'm not going to give my opinions of these books here, but if you have any specific questions on any of them, leave a comment and I'll get right back with you. 

The Bad Place -- Dean Koontz

The Shining -- Stephen King

Time and Again -- Jack Finney

The Lost Symbol -- Dan Brown

The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo -- Stieg Larsson

The Girl Who Played With Fire -- Stieg Larsson

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest -- Stieg Larsson

Side Effects -- Woody Allen

Mere Anarchy -- Woody Allen

Getting Even -- woody Allen

Without Feathers -- Woody Allen

The Passage -- Justin Cronin

Physics of the Impossible -- Michio Kaku

Lightning -- Dean Koontz

Odd Thomas -- Dean Koontz